ZMedia Purwodadi

The Nigerian Prisoner Issue: 3,298 Detainees Awaiting Executions

Table of Contents

The Nigerian Prisoner Issue: 3,298 Detainees Awaiting Executions


The Nigerian Prisoner Issue: 3,298 Detainees Awaiting Executions


The problem of prison overcrowding in Nigeria continues to be discussed in a variety of local government forums all around the nation. For those who are unaware of the real circumstances surrounding the jails, they are still in the state that the British colonialists built for them before their departure in the name of granting us independence. Changing their name from "Nigerian Prison Service (NPS)" to "Nigerian Correctional Service" does not indicate a shift from how they were afterward referred to in Nigeria's judicial system.


Initially, it was intended for correctional institutions to accommodate 50,000 criminals, but at now, this nation's jails are home to more than 73,000 criminals.

Of course, overcrowding has led to a number of issues, such as poor hygiene, a lack of patient care, an increase in infections, and how prisons are growing worse once inmates are released from these correctional facilities. They started entering at the beginning.


But one of the biggest issues right now is the rise in the number of inmates facing the death penalty. The Correctional Institution revealed a few days ago that there are currently more than 3,298 prisoners around the nation awaiting death sentences. Abubakar Umar, the agency's broadcasting officer, said that once the death penalty is decided upon, it is not immediately carried out.


He continued by saying that the lengthy process is caused by the high courts' decision-making process being appealed.

Some criminals have to wait more than 15 years for their sentences to start. The court has made its decision, and they are awaiting their sentencing for the murder. There are currently 3,298 individuals awaiting the death penalty, so we have a lot of them. They make up around 4.5 percent of all the prisoners we house in our nationwide correctional institutions, he said.


Of course, there has been ongoing debate over the death penalty; some perceive its advantages, while others believe it serves no purpose for the administration of justice or the well-being of the community, and thus advocate for its total abolition.


No matter how one feels about the death penalty, according to this newspaper, it is obvious that those who are facing the death penalty shouldn't have to wait a very long period to receive their sentencing. No, this debt is unacceptable.

It is unfair to the death row inmates, their families, and society as a whole when they are frequently permitted to remain for years without being aware of their condition.


The governors' failure to sign the papers authorizing the execution of the death sentence is one of the sources of these issues. But due to political considerations and other factors, many governors are now hesitant to sign the death warrant. Due to this, those who are currently in prison and face the death penalty must wait out their sentences in the dark.


If memory serves, just two governors have authorized the execution of death sentences for convicts nationwide since the resumption of civilian authority in 1999.

Additionally, it should be reminded that Ibrahim Shekarau, a former governor of Kano State, executed the first person in 2006; the second was Adams Oshiomhole in 2012.


While Oshiomhole was involved in the murder of two persons in his Edo state, the former governor of Kano murdered several convicts who were ready to get the death punishment and they were executed without delay.


While it is possible for governors to oppose the death penalty, it should be noted that the court has already identified those defendants and condemned them to death for the crimes they are accused of.


In our view, the governors' refusal to execute the death sentence amounts to them suppressing the court's decision, which further demonstrates their interference with the court's authority. This is not fair to the prisoners, and it demonstrates how political influence can be used to overturn judicial rulings in this nation.